Not the O Circuit – Nov 2025
As already discussed in my Carretera Austral Part 4 post, 5 people had died on the O Circuit 5 days before we were due to start it. Our last two days in Puerto Varas had been intended for preparation for the O Circuit but instead we were searching the internet for anything relating to the circumstances, and trying to work out what to do.
Do we just work on the assumption that it will re-open in time for us to start walking? Do we try and hedge our bets with options both ways? Do we just assume it won’t re-open in time and plan for that? We looked at the forecast for the days we were meant to be going over John Gardner Pass. We bought microspikes. I became a reddit reader for the first time in my life.
In some ways it was a good thing we only had 2 days between when we found out on Wednesday night and when we were due to start on Saturday morning. It meant we couldn’t spend too long thinking about it. After ruminating on it for a day we concluded that we should just pivot to doing the W trek.
For those not familiar with the O/W – the O Circuit, as the name implies, is a circuit, normally done over 8 days. Three of those days (the section on the Northern side of the range) have to be walked in an anti-clockwise direction. On the 4th day the O Circuit goes over John Gardner Pass and arrives at Grey Campsite. The W Trek can be walked in either direction and starts (or ends) at Grey and goes through to Las Torres Hotel (where the O starts) i.e. the W is 4 of the 8 days of the O Circuit. The W side of the circuit is a circus compared to the more remote northern side. The W can be accessed in multiple places, so you will encounter people doing short day trips, long day trips, two, three, four night trips, and going in any which direction.
Our (new) plan was to get to Grey campsite on the day we should have walked over the pass. But, since we weren’t going to be walking the O we needed to work out how we were going to get there. The most common and cheapest option is to get a catamaran across Pehoé Lake and then walk from Paine Grande to Grey, then walk back again the next day and camp at Paine Grande on the second night. Neither Tom or I had any interest in walking Paine Grande – Grey and then returning on the same track the next day, so the alternate option was to get the Lago Grey Ferry to Grey directly. This is much more expensive as the ferry is mainly a sight-seeing excursion (rather than hiker transport) that sails across the face of Grey Glacier. This sounds amazing, but of the three daily sailings two of them go to the face of the Glacier before dropping off at Grey, the other one drops off at Grey then goes to the Glacier. The only sailing which had any availability left on it was the one which went directly to Grey which was made it a particularly bitter expense since we didn’t even get the sight-seeing bit! Anyway, at least we had a way secured to get onto the W.
If you’re interested in our reasoning for the pivot, here are the various reasons which contributed to the decision:
- There was every chance the O wasn’t going to re-open in time, so the earlier we made the decision the more time we had to re-arrange plans (which would mean less stress)
- The forecast for the day we were due to go over the pass was ok, but the days on either side weren’t great. Given hikers were likely to be super nervous given the events of the previous week we didn’t want to get caught up in chaos around the pass.* And the weather could obviously move around from the current forecast.
- We realised how vulnerable we would be (and most hikers are) since we’d elected to book pre-erected tents. We didn’t have a shelter with us, so if we did get caught in weather we wouldn’t be able to bunker down.
- After all the hiking we’d done on the Carretera Austral we weren’t feeling fresh, and weren’t that excited for an 8 day hike
With the decision made that we were just doing the W, we had 3 extra days in Puerto Natales. Our first day, originally meant for grocery shopping, we tracked down one of the best coffees we had on our trip. Then managed to hire a car for a couple of days so we could visit Torres del Paine National Park as a day trip.
The next day we drove the ‘back route’ (Y-290) into Torres del Paine National Park. The road was some gravel and some ashphalt. It was a pleasant morning and we stopped at a few lookouts on the way in, and did a short walk to Salto Chico (waterfall). Then we did a longer walk up to Mirador Condor, where we had morning tea. I walked back to the car the way we’d come, and then drove along the road to pick up Tom at the alternative trailhead.
At this stage we hadn’t really run into too many people, and had probably been lulled into a false sense of quietness. Our next stop was to visit Mirador Cuernos/Salto Grande but the car park was packed! We ended up having to park at the catamaran parking area and walked back along the road. We had lunch at Mirador Cuernos – we seemed to be at the end of the peak, so by the time we’d finished lunch it was a lot quieter than when we’d arrived.
As we finished lunch the cloud had started forming and was quite dramatic over the peaks as we headed back.
As we continued our loop around the park we encountered a large number of cars parked along the road. Curiosity meant we stopped to find out why they were all there. Apparently a puma with a kill was behind some bushes, only about 30m off the road. There were some very serious wildlife photographers set for the long haul, but after 20 minutes and no action I was keen to be on our way. As a consolation prize as we were on our way out of the park I spotted an Andean Fox which Tom managed to photograph, and then a flock of rheas (ostrich like birds) on the main road. It was a long day, but we did get to see a bunch of stuff in the park we wouldn’t have seen if we’d been on the O.
The next day we headed to the Mylodon Cave National Monument which is only a 30 minute drive from Puerto Natales. We were pleasantly surprised by our visit here. We walked to the smallest cave (Cueva Chico) first, the walking track was surprisingly sheltered given it was a very windy day. The landscape was level and somewhat different to what we’d had. We did regret the order we’d chosen to do things once we found picnic tables (a rare site in Chile) near Cueva Chico – we had to settle with having morning tea there since we hadn’t brought lunch with us. From there we walked past The Devil’s Chair and to the medium cave (Cueva de Media).
Next was up the hill to the mirador – where it was exceedingly windy and we did not last long. We’d chosen the order since we figured we’d save the biggest for last, but we’d been quite surprised how large the first two caves had been. Finally, we got to Cueva Grande (Big Cave). It was pretty impressive.
Then we did manage lunch on some picnic tables but essentially in the car park, so not anywhere near as nice as our morning tea spot. It was a very enjoyable visit – we spent about 3 hours there – and was one of the few places in Chile where it felt that the entry fee was actually going into developing the site into a tourist-worthy experience.
By coincidence another SBW member was in town – also impacted by the O Circuit closure – so we caught up with him for a hearty meat filled dinner.
Our third extra day we spent getting food and preparing for the W track. We were pleasantly surprised by the things we were able to get in the various supermarkets. The best win from our perspective were dehydrated tomatoes. We opted to just get BackCountry dehy meals for dinner – but if you didn’t want to incur that cost there were plenty of things you could buy for dinners e.g. pasta, noodles.
————–
*There are many issues with the way things currently run in Torres del Paine. It is immensely popular and so camping and refugio spaces are booked out six months in advance. If the weather is poor on the day you are supposed to go over the pass then there doesn’t seem to be any capacity for delaying – more people are going to arrive at the campsite you’re meant to vacate. And if you do delay, then you will then be out of sync with your bookings for the future campsites. Unless that issue is addressed (and that would require significant change) I think it’s quite possible a similar tragedy could occur again. This is compounded by many people not carrying tents – so unable to erect a shelter if caught in inclement weather.











































































